|
By Judy
Mann
Wednesday, March 1, 2000; Page C15
Let's venture down memory
lane to the wonderful world of high school, when everybody's favorite
subject was picking on people who were "different." Ridicule was a high
art form; so was snickering behind kids' backs. Isolating people who were
different was another cruel peer punishment. You didn't complain to school
authorities, because they didn't care.
In my high school, teenagers who were different were the ones
who wore the "wrong" shoes, who were smart, who were foreigners or had
serious acne. Today, the standards have changed. Young people are being
labeled "different" for a reason we hadn't even heard of back then: sexual
preference. As heterosexual young people have become sexually active
earlier, homosexual youngsters have been asserting their sexual identity
at earlier ages as well. They are paying a steep price.
In Massachusetts, a survey found that 97 percent of high school
students heard homophobic remarks regularly from their peers and that 53
percent said they heard them from school staff members. Another study
conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health and the state Education
Department found gay students are four times as likely as heterosexual
children to be threatened with a weapon at school. The same study found
gay youngsters are three to seven times as likely to attempt suicide.
While gay-bashing is flourishing, it is a tribute to the
tolerance and good sense of many youngsters that some 600 gay-straight
alliance clubs have sprung up in high schools and middle schools across
the country, according to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network.
Some schools have encouraged them, understanding the value of support
groups for gay students and the children of gay parents, and the value of
those clubs in teaching tolerance. But predictably, in Orange County,
Calif., the school district is trying to ban such a club.
Homophobia's impact on gay children is a major concern to such
organizations as the Child Welfare League of America and the National
Mental Health Association, as well as numerous medical, civil rights and
religious organizations. They believe one of the people causing damage to
these children is Laura Schlessinger, the blowhard, right-wing talk show
host who has parlayed a doctorate in physiology and a license in
counseling into a multimedia Guardianship of the Nation's Morals. She has
the dubious distinction of surpassing Rush Limbaugh to become the premiere
entertainment form for some 20 million Americans who listen to talk radio.
A convert to Judaism five years ago, she frequently hijacks religious
tenets and invents fanciful medical information to bolster her harangues.
She has become so openly anti-gay that the Gay and Lesbian
Alliance Against Defamation began posting transcripts of her programs on
its Web site (www.glaad.org). Here are some samples:
"If you're gay or lesbian, it's a biological error that
inhibits you from relating normally to the opposite sex." From the same
show: "Nobody said they were 'bad people' or incompetent or not
intelligent or not good citizens. They just said the sexual behavior is
deviant, and we don't want it in schools, and we don't want it to be
recognized on the same level as heterosexuality."
Or this, on lesbian parents: "It's not normal. It's not in the
best interest of children. This is a travesty that these two lesbians were
given two little children, intentionally depriving them of a father. It's
despicable. It's unhealthy. The psychological literature backs up what I'm
saying."
Schlessinger has also become a loud voice in the "reparative
therapy" movement, which holds that homosexuality can be "cured." How you
cure a "biological error" is beyond me, but surely Radio's Queen of Mean
would have an answer. "Willpower, stupid."
Led by the San Francisco-based Horizons Foundation, more than
180 organizations and individuals, including some of the country's most
prominent scholars, psychiatrists, pediatricians, rabbis and ministers,
have written Schlessinger a letter expressing concern that her statements
are contributing to fear and hatred of gay people. "We are especially
concerned that your commentaries are teaching otherwise happy and healthy
young people to hate themselves," they write.
They cite peer-reviewed studies that show heterosexual men pose
a greater risk to children than do homosexuals, contrary to one of her
assertions. They point out that the idea that homosexuality is an illness
has been thoroughly repudiated.
"Having an adult reinforce some of the harassment and bullying
these kids get does nothing but exacerbate the dilemma they find
themselves in," said Shay Bilchik, executive director of the Child Welfare
League. The letter, he said, was an attempt to make Schlessinger aware
that children are being harmed by rhetoric that labels them as deviants
who need to be cured. "If we fail to respond to that, our silence is
abandoning those kids."
The letter takes the high road and corrects her many mistakes
with scholarly citations. It points out that with her huge following, she
could "help kids by speaking out against homophobia and anti-gay
violence."
But the harsh reality of the situation is that she spews venom
about homosexuals that would have knocked a radio personality off the air
in five minutes if he had applied it to African Americans. Imagine what
would happen if one of the shock jocks declared that being black was a
"biological error." He wouldn't even get the Greaseman's shot at
resurrecting his career on a 6,000-watt station in the Virgin Islands.
Sadly, homophobia has not risen to the level of racism and
sexism in our cultural taboos. And as it is with any group that is
"different," it is the children who suffer the most.
© Copyright 2000 The Washington Post Company
|