Tampa Bay Coalition
TBC GLBT Crime & Justice
News
Dog Mauling Trial Begins Day
1: 2/19/02
Trial of Owners of Dogs that Attacked
and Mauled Diane Whipple to Death
Photo Credit Court
TV
Judge
James
Warren
Robert
Noel
Marjorie Knoller
Defense
Attorney
Lead
Prosecutor Defense
Attorney
Bruce
Hotchkiss
James
Hammer Nedra
Ruiz
Lead prosecutor James Hammer
Opening Statements: Video Clip (37:39)
Marjorie
Knoller Robert Noel
Court TV
Opening arguments began Tuesday for a San Francisco couple
facing murder charges after their dog mauled a neighbor to
death.
Emotional openings kick off dog maul trial
By Rochelle Steinhaus
Court TV
Passionate opening statements, gruesome photos and
conflicting accounts of a deadly 12-minute attack marked the first day of the
dog mauling trial of two San Francisco lawyers
Passionate opening statements, gruesome photos and
conflicting accounts of a deadly 12-minute attack marked the first day of the
dog mauling trial of two San Francisco lawyers.
Lead prosecutor James Hammer told the jury that Knoller, 46,
is guilty of murder, having done nothing before the attack to protect others
from dogs she knew were dangerous — or after the attack, leaving a helpless,
naked and bloody Whipple in the hallway alone without calling 911. The college
lacrosse coach died hours later
Displaying graphic autopsy photographs showing numerous
deep bite marks on the back of Whipple's neck, arms, back and legs, Hammer
refuted Knoller's claim that she used her body as a shield in an effort to save
Whipple's life.
"How does Diane Whipple get all of those wounds and every
piece of clothing ripped from her body...if that woman is on top of her the
whole time?" Hammer asked during his opening statement presented to the Los
Angeles jury. The case was moved from San Francisco because of the extensive
pretrial publicity
Knoller's defense lawyer Nedra Ruiz countered that Knoller
was soaked in blood as she risked her own life to try to save Whipple. Ruiz had
her own photographs to show the jury — of her client covered in blood. "The
evidence will not show that Marjorie stood back and let this horrible thing
happen to that beautiful girl," said Ruiz, breaking into tears. "This blood
soaking occurs when you put your body on a beserko crazy dog."
In her mocha business suit, Ruiz crawled on the courtroom
floor to demonstrate the defense's version of events, which paint Knoller as not
a criminal but a heroine.
"No one is sorrier that Marjorie
Knoller could not save Ms. Whipple than Marjorie Knoller, who
risked her life trying to save Ms. Whipple," she said.
Noel's defense lawyer, Bruce Hotchkiss, said a flat tire was
the reason his client wasn't near the grisly scene at the time. The burly
60-year-old defendant faces charges of manslaughter and keeping a dangerous
animal stemming from allegations that he and Knoller were aware the dogs were
vicious.
In his opening statement, prosecutor Hammer said both
defendants had "extensive knowledge" and "received repeated warnings" that the
dogs were dangerous. He said that Whipple's was not the first incident to
demonstrate that Noel and Knoller's two Presa Canarios had aggressive natures,
but that there were nearly 30 prior incidents of the dogs acting in an
aggressive manner to passersby or neighbors.
"The evidence will show they disregarded all of those
warnings and Diane Whipple is dead as a result of that," Hammer said.
Hammer also charged that the two dogs, Bane and Hera, who
have since been killed, were part of a dog-raising scheme masterminded by
Paul "Cornfed" Schneider, a
39-year-old prison inmate whom the defendants legally adopted three days after
Whipple's attack. He detailed the bizarre relationship the married lawyers
shared with him. He is serving a life sentence for attempted murder.
Before testimony began, Hotchkiss concluded his brief
opening statement by telling the jury he expects prosecutors to present evidence
that will showcase the couple's "unconventional lifestyle."
"Having an unconventional lifestyle does not determine guilt
or innocence," he said
Both sides revealed some of the witnesses will take the
stand during the trial, such as canine experts, neighbors who will testify about
the dogs' behavior and the woman who initially raised Bane and Hera.
Perhaps the most unexpected revelation was confirmation
that Knoller will testify.
The announcement came as a result of Ruiz's attempt to
play a recording of Knoller's police interview for the jury. Although Judge
James Warren wouldn't allow it, since the tape is not in evidence and would be
considered hearsay, he did say that Ruiz could summarize for the jury what
Knoller will testify to — if she is taking the stand.
"Ms. Knoller will definitely testify in this action," Ruiz
told Warren.
Though jurors unable to hear Knoller's police statement,
they did get to see the couple's interview with "Good Morning America" which was
conducted prior to the couple's indictment. During the interview, Knoller denied
that the dogs were vicious — along with any responsibility for the
attack.
"Ms. Whipple had ample opportunity to move into her
apartment," Knoller says in the video. "She could have just slammed the door
shut — I would have."
Among other witnesses the jury will hear from is Esther
Birkmair, a 78-year-old neighbor who prosecutors say heard the attack and even
saw part of it through her peephole. While Hammer said that the elderly woman
observed a dog on top of Whipple and heard the dogs pounding on her door
following the attack, Ruiz maintains that Birkmair later identified the body on
top of Whipple's as Knoller's. The defense also contends that it was not the
dogs pounding on the door, but Knoller in a desperate call for
help.
Hammer also told jurors that police arrived on the scene
to find Whipple alone in the hallway with one of the dogs still running loose.
But Ruiz says that Knoller had already secured both dogs inside the apartment
and that, contrary to her own client's grand jury testimony, Knoller was not
looking for her keys before police arrived.
While the prosecutor outlined several examples of
witnesses who say the dogs were dangerous, Ruiz noted instances in which the
dogs displayed obedient behavior and the couple acted as responsible dog
owners.
The trial was broadcast on Court TV during opening
statements, and will air live during closing arguments and the verdict. While
Court TV sought to broadcast the trial in its entirety, the judge only allowed
cameras in the courtroom during those three phases of the trial.
Resource: Court TV
©2002 Courtroom Television Network LLC. All Rights
Reserved
Close Window to Return to TBC
Web Site