By Judy
Mann
Wednesday, March 1, 2000; Page C15
Let's venture
down memory lane to the wonderful world of high school, when everybody's
favorite subject was picking on people who were "different." Ridicule was
a high art form; so was snickering behind kids' backs. Isolating people
who were different was another cruel peer punishment. You didn't complain
to school authorities, because they didn't care.
In my high school, teenagers who were different
were the ones who wore the "wrong" shoes, who were smart, who were
foreigners or had serious acne. Today, the standards have changed. Young
people are being labeled "different" for a reason we hadn't even heard of
back then: sexual preference. As heterosexual young people have become
sexually active earlier, homosexual youngsters have been asserting their
sexual identity at earlier ages as well. They are paying a steep price.
In Massachusetts, a survey found that 97 percent of
high school students heard homophobic remarks regularly from their peers
and that 53 percent said they heard them from school staff members.
Another study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health and the
state Education Department found gay students are four times as likely as
heterosexual children to be threatened with a weapon at school. The same
study found gay youngsters are three to seven times as likely to attempt
suicide.
While gay-bashing is flourishing, it is a tribute
to the tolerance and good sense of many youngsters that some 600
gay-straight alliance clubs have sprung up in high schools and middle
schools across the country, according to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight
Education Network. Some schools have encouraged them, understanding the
value of support groups for gay students and the children of gay parents,
and the value of those clubs in teaching tolerance. But predictably, in
Orange County, Calif., the school district is trying to ban such a club.
Homophobia's impact on gay children is a major
concern to such organizations as the Child Welfare League of America and
the National Mental Health Association, as well as numerous medical, civil
rights and religious organizations. They believe one of the people causing
damage to these children is Laura Schlessinger, the blowhard, right-wing
talk show host who has parlayed a doctorate in physiology and a license in
counseling into a multimedia Guardianship of the Nation's Morals. She has
the dubious distinction of surpassing Rush Limbaugh to become the premiere
entertainment form for some 20 million Americans who listen to talk radio.
A convert to Judaism five years ago, she frequently hijacks religious
tenets and invents fanciful medical information to bolster her harangues.
She has become so openly anti-gay that the Gay and
Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation began posting transcripts of her
programs on its Web site (www.glaad.org). Here are some samples:
"If you're gay or lesbian, it's a biological error
that inhibits you from relating normally to the opposite sex." From the
same show: "Nobody said they were 'bad people' or incompetent or not
intelligent or not good citizens. They just said the sexual behavior is
deviant, and we don't want it in schools, and we don't want it to be
recognized on the same level as heterosexuality."
Or this, on lesbian parents: "It's not normal. It's
not in the best interest of children. This is a travesty that these two
lesbians were given two little children, intentionally depriving them of a
father. It's despicable. It's unhealthy. The psychological literature
backs up what I'm saying."
Schlessinger has also become a loud voice in the
"reparative therapy" movement, which holds that homosexuality can be
"cured." How you cure a "biological error" is beyond me, but surely
Radio's Queen of Mean would have an answer. "Willpower, stupid."
Led by the San Francisco-based Horizons Foundation,
more than 180 organizations and individuals, including some of the
country's most prominent scholars, psychiatrists, pediatricians, rabbis
and ministers, have written Schlessinger a letter expressing concern that
her statements are contributing to fear and hatred of gay people. "We are
especially concerned that your commentaries are teaching otherwise happy
and healthy young people to hate themselves," they write.
They cite peer-reviewed studies that show
heterosexual men pose a greater risk to children than do homosexuals,
contrary to one of her assertions. They point out that the idea that
homosexuality is an illness has been thoroughly repudiated.
"Having an adult reinforce some of the harassment
and bullying these kids get does nothing but exacerbate the dilemma they
find themselves in," said Shay Bilchik, executive director of the Child
Welfare League. The letter, he said, was an attempt to make Schlessinger
aware that children are being harmed by rhetoric that labels them as
deviants who need to be cured. "If we fail to respond to that, our silence
is abandoning those kids."
The letter takes the high road and corrects her
many mistakes with scholarly citations. It points out that with her huge
following, she could "help kids by speaking out against homophobia and
anti-gay violence."
But the harsh reality of the situation is that she
spews venom about homosexuals that would have knocked a radio personality
off the air in five minutes if he had applied it to African Americans.
Imagine what would happen if one of the shock jocks declared that being
black was a "biological error." He wouldn't even get the Greaseman's shot
at resurrecting his career on a 6,000-watt station in the Virgin Islands.
Sadly, homophobia has not risen to the level of
racism and sexism in our cultural taboos. And as it is with any group that
is "different," it is the children who suffer the most.
© Copyright 2000 The Washington Post Company
|