Tom Cruise is
straight -- get over it The hunky actor shouldn't be accused of
homophobia for not wanting to be labeled as a gay man if he's
not By Jeff
Epperly
Poor Tom Cruise. There's no course
of action he could take in the ongoing saga over his real or
perceived sexual orientation without offending someone,
somewhere.
Now there are gay activists who are angry that
he's filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against gay porn star Kyle
Bradford, who's alleged to have told two magazines that he had an
affair with Cruise. (Bradford's real name is supposedly Chad Slater,
but I'm suspicious since that sounds like another name he pulled off
the back of a Falcon film.)
Bradford denies it all,
maintaining that he never even gave the interviews in question.
Cruise and his lawyers are pushing ahead nonetheless, saying
``Bradford's defamatory statements are of a kind calculated to cause
Cruise harm in his profession and ability to earn. Because Cruise is
a motion picture actor, he is dependent upon worldwide public
acceptance of his films. Losing the respect and enthusiasm of a
substantial segment of the movie going public would cost Cruise
very substantial sums."
Cruise, through his lawyers, take
pains to point out that ``while [Cruise] believes in the right of
others to follow their own sexual preference, vast numbers of the
public throughout the world do not share that view and, believing
that he had a homosexual affair and did so during his marriage, they
will be less inclined to patronize Cruise's films, particularly
since he tends to play parts calling for heterosexual romance and
action adventure. Cruise has suffered and will suffer personal and
professional harm."
All of this has certain activists in the
gay and lesbian community in a huff, since filing a lawsuit for
being called gay has set off their hypersensitive homophobia alarms.
``I don't care if Tom [Cruise] is straight, gay, bi or has sex with
female poodles, but I do care when he makes out that being
identified as gay is libelous and akin to being called a murderer or
drug addict," wrote longtime activist Nicole Ramirez Murray in a
June 14 op-ed piece in San Diego's Gay and Lesbian Times. ``Tom
Cruise's lawsuits are an insult to all gays and lesbians, and we
should stop seeing his movies. Yes, let's boycott Tom
Cruise!"
Boycott? Why? Cruise seems like a decent sort of
fellow by Hollywood standards as long as you ignore that Scientology
nonsense. And I don't see anything in any of his or his lawyers'
statements that even comes close to comparing homosexuality with
homicide or drug addiction.
As for whether Cruise is gay, I
don't believe it. To paraphrase Roseanne: What does he do, kill all
his tricks and boyfriends when he's done with them? (To see an
excellent take on this question, see Bruce Vilanch's recent column
in The Advocate.)
But, of course, the Cruise-is-gay rumors
have circulated for years -- long enough that some people believed
them without basis and apparently thought they could get away with
making some money selling their bogus stories about a man they
probably thought would never fight back because he's jammed so far
in the closet.
But there is a deeper issue here aside from
Cruise's sexuality: Why are so many so emotionally invested in
whether a complete stranger -- he's only a movie actor -- is gay?
And this goes for Rosie and all the rest, too. Yeah, they all have
admirable qualities, but so do a lot of people who aren't famous and
are doing a helluva lot more to make the world a better place. And
those non-famous people say every day simply to the world, ``Yeah,
I'm gay. So?"
But in American society fame and wealth are
seen as indicators of the worth of those who have them. No surprise
then that so many have a need to see famous tooth-capped plastic
people come out of the closet. ``Jeez, if a famous rich guy is gay,
then it must be OK for me to be gay too!"
It's all so sick
and twisted, especially when the hounding continues after the famous
alleged homosexual denies being gay. What a role model! A gay who is
gay but can't (or won't) admit it!
We've got a sick hunger in
this society, and it's being fed by an incessant media stream of
celebrity worship disguised as news -- that is, when the
entertainment industry bothers to attempt to disguise its PR
juggernaut at all.
That so many are interested in Tom
Cruise's sexual orientation suggests that industry has
won.
|